<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://www.doaj.org/schemas/doajArticles.xsd">


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>59</startPage>
              <endPage>65</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.010</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>165</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Minimally invasive approach to pleural empyema: uniportal or biportal?</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Kerim  Tuluce</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hasan  Turut</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department Thoracic Surgery, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Training and Research, Rize, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the standard treatment method
for pleural empyema’s surgical treatment. Postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and cosmetic
results are satisfactory, especially with the uniportal approach. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated
and compared outcomes of patients treated with uniportal and biportal VATS.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;A total of 73 patients who underwent VATS for empyema in our clinic between
January 2017 and October 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent uniportal and
biportal VATS were compared in terms of age, sex, side and stage of empyema, length of hospital stay,
comorbidities, smoking history, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score,
number of chest tubes placed postoperatively, postoperative Heimlich valve placement, postoperative
complications, postoperative drainage volume, recurrence, preoperative and 72-h postoperative C-reactive
protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) values, and postoperative 24-h and 72-h VAS (visual analog
scale) pain scores. Univariate comparisons were done with R-based Jamovi statistical software.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Fifty-two (71.2%) of the patients were male, and the mean age was 57 (IQR 41-67). Empyema
was stage 2 in 38 (52.1%) patients and stage 3 in 35 (47.9%) patients. VATS was uniportal in 52
patients (71.2%) and biportal in 21 patients (28.8%). The uniportal VATS group had significantly lower
drainage volume (p = 0.006) and VAS scores (p &lt; 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the
other parameters.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Our data indicate that uniportal VATS was superior to biportal VATS for the treatment of
empyema in terms of postoperative pain and drainage.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=165</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>minimally invasive surgery</keyword><keyword>thoracoscopy</keyword><keyword>video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery</keyword><keyword>empyema</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>66</startPage>
              <endPage>73</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.011</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>166</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Conservative approach versus invasive approach for pneumothorax secondary to blunt trauma</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Özgür  İşgörücü</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Teaching Hospital for Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;The management of minimal pneumothorax, which has been detected more frequently
with the increasing use of computed tomography, especially after blunt trauma, is controversial. This
study aimed to examine the results of patients with pneumothorax secondary to blunt trauma and
contribute to the treatment protocol for this group of patients.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;A retrospective analysis of patients with pneumothorax after blunt trauma
(n = 103) presenting to the emergency department during the 1-year period from January 2019 to
January 2020 was performed. Oxygen inhalation was performed in patients who were followed up
conservatively, and tube thoracostomy was performed in patients who were treated invasively.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Among 766 patients with blunt trauma, 141 (18.4%) patients had a traumatic pneumothorax.
Mechanical ventilation was required in 26.2% (n = 27) patients. Further, 73 (70.8%) patients with
pneumothorax were followed up conservatively. The remaining 30 (29.1%) patients underwent tube
thoracostomy. The median size of the pneumothorax (9 vs. 29 mm; p &lt; 0.0001; hazard ratio [HR] = 5.08)
was significantly different between the groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that positive pressure
ventilation and pneumothorax size did not pose an additional risk of failure in conservative management
(HR = 1.49; p = 0.25 and HR = 10.2; p = 0.09, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that the
presence of hemothorax and subcutaneous emphysema (HR = 14.4; p = 0.018 and HR = 13.1; p = 0.019,
respectively) led to failure of conservative treatment.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; The presence of hemothorax and subcutaneous emphysema was an independent factor
leading to failure of conservative treatment. In the presence of these two findings indicating major
trauma, invasive treatment is recommended.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=166</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>trauma</keyword><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword><keyword>tube thoracostomy</keyword><keyword>surgery</keyword><keyword>mechanical ventilation</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>74</startPage>
              <endPage>81</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.012</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>167</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">We need a common definition and treatment algorithm for displaced rib fracture</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Önder  Kavurmacı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Sercan  Aydın</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Barış  Gülmez</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Seda  Kahraman</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Tevfik İlker Akçam</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ali  Özdil</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ayşe Gül Ergönül</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Onur  Akçay</name>
                                <affiliationId>5</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Banu  Yoldaş</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Asuman Akın Türker</name>
                                <affiliationId>6</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ekin  Zorlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ali  Karakılıç</name>
                                <affiliationId>7</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Izmir Democracy University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Dr Suat Seren Chest Science and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="5">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bakırçay University, Çiğli Education Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="6">Bodrum State Hospital, Muğla, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="7">Balıkesir Atatürk City Hospital, Balıkesir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Displaced rib fracture (DRF) definition is frequently used to draw attention to severity
and importance of fracture in daily practice. DRF is associated with increased morbidity and mortality
in addition patients with DRF should be followed more carefully. Despite these characteristics, we do
not have a clear definition for DRF concept and big differences of opinion among physicians could be
monitored. In this study, we tried to reveal these perceptual differences and emphasized the importance
of creating a common language for DRF.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; We used a special and inventive survey form which contains visual section,
true-false section and case reports. In the visual section, real tomography images and schematic
drawings were presented to participants and asked which were compatible with DRF. In the true-false
section, propositions about the definition of DRF were presented. Finally, imaginary trauma cases were
presented and the minimum follow-up period was questioned.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;156 physicians from 23 different center were included in the study. Of the participants, 56 (35.9%)
were emergency physicians, 54 (34.6%) were thoracic surgeons and 46 (29.5%) were radiologists. The
answers were statistically different for 3 tomography image (p = 0.056, p &lt; 0.001, p = 0.001) and for 1
schematic drawings (p = 0.001). Again in 4 of the 7 true-false questions, there were significant differences
between answers (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.005, p &lt; 0.001). The minimum follow-up period for a patient
with DRF was also different between physicians, and have been recommended as 15.9 ± 2.2 (2-72 hours)
by emergency physicians, 27.3 ± 5.5 (2-120) by radiologist and 31.5 ± 3.1 (2-120) by thoracic surgeons.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Our study clearly demonstrates a big conflict about DRF defination and treatment among
physicians. There is also no consensus on the minimum follow-up time. We believe that our study will
be a guide for multidisciplinary clinical studies on this subject.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=167</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>fractures</keyword><keyword>injuries</keyword><keyword>radiology</keyword><keyword>ribs</keyword><keyword>questionnaires</keyword><keyword>emergencies</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>82</startPage>
              <endPage>86</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.013</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>168</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Elastofibroma dorsi prevalance in patients with primary complaint of dorsalgia</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Zeynep Nilüfer Tekin</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Zeynep  Bilgi</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Onur  Akçay</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Funda  Cansun</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Esen  Kasapoğlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>5</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Radiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Göztepe Prof Dr Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bakırçay University Ciğli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="5">Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of elastofibroma dorsi (EFD) in
computed tomography (CT) imaging of the thorax in patients with dorsalgia.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;Patients who are greater than or equal to 50 years old and presented to our institution
with chief complaint of dorsalgia and received a thoracic CT were identified and recorded in a database
together with demographic information. Control group was chosen from consecutive trauma patients in the
same age group and presented to emergency room and received thoracic CT as standard of care.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Out of 83 patients with common complaint dorsalgia, 9 (9/83, 10.8%) patients had no lesions
and EFD was observed in 74 of the patients (74/83, 89.2%). 140 EFD including 106 (106/140, 75.7%)
with a subscapular localization and 34 (34/140, 24.3%) with an infrascapular extension were identified.
The maximum diameter average was 4.1 cm (range = 1-11.5 cm). Unilateral lesion was detected in
8 (8/74, 10.8%) and bilateral lesions was observed in 66 (66/74, 89.2%) of the patients. Detection of
EFD in patients with isolated dorsalgia complaints was significantly higher than patients with multiple
complaints (78.4% vs 21.6%, p = 0.009).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Middle aged and elderly patients with isolated dorsalgia show an unusually high EFD
prevalence. Clinical suspicion and diagnostic work-up can help those cases for timely diagnosis and
treatment.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=168</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>Elastofibroma dorsi</keyword><keyword>thorax CT</keyword><keyword>dorsalgia</keyword><keyword>prevalence</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>87</startPage>
              <endPage>91</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.014</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>169</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">An analysis of cigarette smoking in thoracic surgery patients</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yunus  Seyrek</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Onur Volkan Yaran</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Merve  Özbek</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Nilüfer  Menekşe</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Levent  Cansever</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Mehmet Ali Bedirhan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Application and Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Cigarette smoke (CS) is a long-term risk factor for several disorders of the respiratory
and cardiovascular systems. In this study, we aimed to analyze the current effects of cigarette smoke
on patients who underwent thoracic surgery. In line with this purpose, we analyzed patients who were
admitted to a thoracic surgery clinic recently and their smoking history.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; We reviewed patients who underwent thoracic surgery (n = 867) and were
admitted to our clinic between January 2018 and December 2018. The patients were categorized
into seven groups comprising the most common types of thoracic pathology as, lung carcinoma (n
= 338), pneumothorax (n = 219), pleural effusion (n = 131), mediastinal lymphadenopathy (n = 77),
pneumomediastinum (n = 22), bronchiectasis (n = 30), and hydatid cyst (n = 10). Cases were reviewed in
detail for demographics, smoking history in terms of pack-years, thoracic pathology, and hospitalization
duration (days).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Statistical analysis revealed that smoking is still a significant factor contributing to lung
cancer. Cigarette smoke did not appear to be a factor in mediastinal lymphadenopathy, bronchiectasis,
pleural effusion or hydatid cyst cases. Additionally, hospitalization duration was significantly longer in
the smoker group.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;The data reviewed are compatible with the current knowledge on the mechanisms of
cigarette smoke-related pathologies. Cigarette smoke is still associated with common thoracic surgery
pathologies such as lung carcinoma, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum. This may be rephrased
thus, the absence of cigarette smoke would greatly decrease the prevalence of thoracic surgery cases.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=169</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>cigarette smoking</keyword><keyword>lung neoplasms</keyword><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword><keyword>pleural effusion</keyword><keyword>lymphadenopathy</keyword><keyword>mediastinum</keyword><keyword>COPD</keyword><keyword>thoracic surgery</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>92</startPage>
              <endPage>96</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.015</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>170</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Giant pediatric intrathoracic ganglioneuroma: a case report and review of the literature</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Buse Mine Konuk Balcı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Gökhan  Kocaman</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Mehmet Ali Sakallı</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Bülent Mustafa Yenigün</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ayşegül Gürsoy Çoruh</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Bilge Ayça Kırmızı</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Aylin  Heper</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Serkan  Enön</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Iskenderun State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Pathology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">4Department of Radiology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Ganglioneuroma is an extremely rare (incidence 1/1,000,000) well-differentiated neurogenic tumor that
mostly originates from neural crest cells. The average age of diagnosis is 7 years old and it is mostly
located in the posterior mediastinum (37.5%). Here we present a 10-year-old girl with a giant thoracic
ganglioneuroma. The tumor was resected via posterolateral thoracotomy. With our case report included,
there are 10 cases of surgically treated pediatric giant intrathoracic ganglioneuroma.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=170</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>giant</keyword><keyword>ganglioneuroma</keyword><keyword>pediatric</keyword><keyword>thoracic surgery</keyword><keyword>posterior mediastinal tumors</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>97</startPage>
              <endPage>100</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.016</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>171</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">The surgical repair of a trauma-related sternoclavicular joint dislocation using the musculus gracilis tendon</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Sule  Karadayi</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fatmagul  Demir</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Seyran  Kılınç</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Orthopedics, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) dislocations are rare, and these dislocations may be traumatic or atraumatic.
In this study, we will examine the treatment management of a patient whose SCJ was anteriorly
dislocated following a traffic accident. We performed open stabilization for SCJ dislocation using the
musculus gracilis tendon. Although the first treatment option in acute cases is closed reduction and
stabilization, we recommend surgical repair because the probability of recurrence is high. The gracilis
tendon is a good option for joint stabilization.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=171</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>sternoclavicular joint</keyword><keyword>trauma</keyword><keyword>accidents</keyword><keyword>injuries</keyword><keyword>joints</keyword><keyword>surgical procedures</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>101</startPage>
              <endPage>104</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.017</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>172</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">A rare cause of acute airway obstruction: tracheal malignant melanoma</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Omer Faruk Demir</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Omer  Onal</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Burcu  Baran</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Alperen  Vural</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Oguzhan  Turan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Tracheal tumors are quite rare, with an incidence of 2.6 per 1,000,000 persons. Tracheal malignant
melanomas are one of the least common types among these tumors due to the lack of natural epithelial
tissue of melanocytes. There is no optimal treatment method for tracheal malign melanomas because
they have an aggressive nature, have limited life expectancy and occur very rarely. This paper discusses
the case of and treatment methods fora patient who was initially suspected to have a foreign body
aspiration because of presenting to hospital with acute airway obstruction.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=172</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>airway obstruction</keyword><keyword>tracheal malign melanoma</keyword><keyword>tracheal tumor</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2022-07-29</publicationDate>
              <volume>7</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>105</startPage>
              <endPage>108</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2022.018</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>173</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Surgical treatment of an intrathoracic rib causing cough in a young woman</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Denizhan  Kılınç</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Merve Sengul Inan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ersin  Sapmaz</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hakan  Işık</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Sedat  Gürkök</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gulhane Education and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Memorial Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Intrathoracic rib is mostly asymptomatic and one of the rare congenital anomalies of thoracic wall.
Keeping in mind its appearance and types on chest x-rays can prevent unnecessary examinations and
invasive procedures. Locations and relationship to adjacent tissues of intrathoracic ribs determine its
clinical course and surgical decision.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=173</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>accessory rib</keyword><keyword>anatomical variations</keyword><keyword>intrathoracic rib</keyword><keyword>rib anomalies</keyword><keyword>supernumerary rib</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record></records>