<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://www.doaj.org/schemas/doajArticles.xsd">


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>68</startPage>
              <endPage>73</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0011</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>196</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Feasibility of uniportal vats in the histopathological diagnosis of the peripheral pulmonary nodules which are marked by methylene blue before resection</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Volkan  Karaçam</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fatma  Mutlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>İlkay  Kaya</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Aytaç  Gülcü</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Kemal Can Tertemiz</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Aydın  Şanlı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Duygu  Gürel</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Chest Diseases, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; This study aims to reveal the diagnostic success to determine nodule localization, by marking
the nodules with methylene blue, its contribution to operation time, and perioperative complications.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; In 52 patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules smaller than 20 mm, the
nodule was marked by injecting 0.5-1 cc methylene blue with the guidance of computed tomography
(CT) with a Chiba needle (22 G), before they were taken to the operating room. A frozen section
examination was done after wedge resection with VATS.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The mean nodule size in the study was 8.85 mm (3-25 mm). The mean measurement distance to
the chest wall at the peripheral endpoint of the nodules was 9.0 mm (1-40 mm). Of the nodules, 22 were
solid, 15 were semisolid, and 15 were ground glass. Pathology subtypes were as follows, especially in
ground glass lesions whose localization could not be determined without marking; 7 adenocarcinomas,
2 adenocarcinomas in situ, 4 atypical adenomatous hyperplasias, and 2 benign cytology. The pathologies
for the other 37 patients resulted in 13 benign cytology, 10 metastases of known malignancy, 3 lung
squamous cell carcinoma (pT1bN0, pT1aN1), 7 adenocarcinoma (pT1aN0- pT2N0), 1 adenocarcinoma
in situ, 2 typical carcinoids (pT1aN0) and 1 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Through CT-guided percutaneous methylene blue marking, the localization of
peripherally located, small-sized, and non-palpable lesions can be detected easily with uVATS. In this
way, unnecessary thoracotomy can be avoided, the operation can be performed quickly and with low
morbidity, and the diagnosis of lung cancer can be provided at an early stage.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=196</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>videothoracoscopic surgery</keyword><keyword>methylene blue</keyword><keyword>dye</keyword><keyword>ground glass nodule</keyword><keyword>uniportal</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>74</startPage>
              <endPage>79</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0012</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>197</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Importance of simulation devices in thoracic surgery education: a prospective comparative study</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Celal Bugra Sezen</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Gamze  Tanrikulu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Mustafa Vedat Dogru</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Semih  Erduhan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yasar  Sonmezoglu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Volkan  Erdogu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Nisa  Yildiz</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ozkan  Saydam</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Muzaffer  Metin</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; This manuscript aims to evaluate VATS lobectomy simulation training and the success of
surgeons who have just started on simulation.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt; In the study, which was designed prospectively, we used a VATS simulation
device to evaluate two expert surgeons and three residents’ VATS right upper lobectomy outcomes. Fortyfive
resections were performed by residents (Group-A), while 43 resections were performed by expert
surgeons (Group-B).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt; 45 (51.1%) were in Group-A, and 43 were in Group-B 78 (88.6%) successful resections were
completed in simulation. The division and stapling time of the bronchus, superior pulmonary vein, and
superior pulmonary artery was shorter for Group-B than for Group-A (p &lt; 0.05). Eight resections (17.8%)
could not be completed in Group-A due to complications, while in Group-B, two resections (4.7%) were
incomplete due to complications (p = 0.090).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt; Based on this study, we believe that the experience of novice surgeons can be increased,
especially with simulation training. Completion of similar operations also showed good content validity,
especially when compared with experienced surgeons.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=197</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>VATS</keyword><keyword>stimulation</keyword><keyword>thoracic surgery</keyword><keyword>lobectomy</keyword><keyword>lung resection</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>80</startPage>
              <endPage>84</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0013</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>198</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Is it a coincidence that covid-19 and pneumothorax coexist?</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Serkan  Bayram</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Mustafa  Akyıl</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Pelin  Erdizci</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Serda Kanbur Metin</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Abidin Levent Alpay</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Selami Volkan Baysungur</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; We aimed to investigate the relationship between COVID-19 and pneumothorax by
examining patients who developed pneumothorax during the treatment of COVID-19 infection, and
patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during hospitalization procedures due to
pneumothorax.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; We retrospectively analyzed patients who were hospitalized due to COVID-19
infection and developed pneumothorax, and patients who were hospitalized for pneumothorax with a
positive COVID-19 test performed during hospitalization procedures, between May 2020 and January
2021. We recorded the demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of the patients; treatment
modalities, and response times to treatment. We investigated the relationship between COVID-19
infection and pneumothorax.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Of the 25 patients included in the study, 20 (80%) were male and 5 (20%) were female. The
average age was 45 (17-77). Sixteen (64%) had thoracic computerized tomography findings consistent
with COVID-19. Bilateral pneumothorax was observed in three (12%) patients. Pneumothorax was seen
in 7 (28%) patients during mechanical ventilation. Tube thoracostomy with wet suction control closeddrainage
system was applied to all patients. The average length of stay in the hospital was 7.8 (3-20) days.
Recurrent pneumothorax developed in two (8%) patients after discharge, while the mortality rate was 12%.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, pneumothorax due to mechanical ventilation can
develop, as well as pneumothorax can be observed even in asymptomatic COVID-19 cases. This condition
needs immediate recognition and prompt treatment as a life-threatening event in COVID-19 patients.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=198</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>COVID-19</keyword><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword><keyword>SARS-CoV-2</keyword><keyword>tube thoracostomy</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>85</startPage>
              <endPage>90</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0014</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>199</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Analysis of non-operative management of 53 thoracic gunshot injuries in a training hospital from a thoracic surgical perspective</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Merve Sengul Inan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hakan  Isik</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ufuk  Unsal</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ersin  Sapmaz</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Kuthan  Kavakli</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hasan  Caylak</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Alper  Gozubuyuk</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gulhane Education and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Although clinicians use selective non-operative control of thoracic gunshot injuries
(TGSI), parameters that may affect the clinical response have not been studied. The aim of this study is
to determine the safety and clinical outcome of non-operative follow-up of TGSIs.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;Demographic, radiological and clinical features of 53 TSGIs, 2 female and 51
male, who were followed conservatively were examined. The data from the patients were retrospectively
studied in terms of age, gender, extra-thoracic organ injuries, duration of chest tube, and length of
hospital stay.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Median age was 24. Twenty patients had extrathoracic injury (%37.7). The presence of
extrathoracic pathology did not affect the total length of stay, but the diameter of hemothorax,
pneumothorax or contusion did. No correlation was observed between the length of stay of the chest
tube and the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) or Injury Severity Score (ISS) of the patients (p
= 0.756, p = 0.160). No correlation was observed between the diameter of the contusion area and the
TTSS score or ISS score (p = 0.672, p = 0.201).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Thoracic gunshot injuries can be approached conservatively by close monitoring and
being aware of all life-threatening conditions. While trauma scores are quite adept at predicting length
of stay, they do not always correlate with trauma severity.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=199</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>gunshot wounds</keyword><keyword>chest</keyword><keyword>penetrating trauma</keyword><keyword>selective nonoperative management</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>91</startPage>
              <endPage>95</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0015</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>200</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Single center experience of war-related thoracic injuries in syria</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ahmet  Ulusan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ibrahim Emre Tunca</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Maruf  Sanli</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ahmet Feridun Isik</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;The Syrian civil war caused serious deaths and injuries. Thoracic surgery has shown
its effectiveness in this war as it is a war surgery. In this study, we aimed to analyze and convey our
experience with 47 war-related chest trauma patients to describe the chest trauma profile and determine
the predictive morbidity and mortality.
In this study, we aimed to analyze and convey our experience with 47 war-related chest trauma patients
to describe the chest trauma profile and determine the predictive morbidity and mortality.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; From 2012 to 2017, 47 consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment for
chest trauma at the Gaziantep University Hospital, in Turkey. The demographic and relevant clinical
information was retrospectively collected from the hospital records. Data included mechanism of
injury, gender, age, findings, treatment modality complications, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and
mortality. Injuries were classified as penetrating (gunshot or shrapnel wounds) and blunt injuries.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The average age of patients was 25.4 years (range, 4 to 43 years) and 40 patients were males
(85%). Sadly, 6 patients were under 18 years old. 41 patients (87.2%) with penetrating and 6 (12.8%)
with blunt injuries. The most penetrating injuries to the chest were caused by shrapnel (61.7%). Eleven
patients had already had emergency thoracotomy in another hospital before admission. In our study, 28
patients had pneumothorax, and 22 patients had hemothorax (Some patients have multiple diagnoses).
However, there were 26 (23.64%) lung contusions in patients. No surgery-related deaths or major
morbidity occurred. So, in all cases, the mortality rate was 2.13%.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Intervention in thoracic trauma patients is lifesaving and satisfying compared to other
system injuries. Most thoracic injuries can be treated with tube thoracostomy and conventional therapy.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=200</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>war</keyword><keyword>thoracic injury</keyword><keyword>surgery</keyword><keyword>trauma</keyword><keyword>penetrating injury</keyword><keyword>blunt injury</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>96</startPage>
              <endPage>99</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0016</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>201</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Analysis of erroneous appointments from the thoracic surgery outpatient clinic of a training hospital</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ekin  Zorlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Önder  Kavurmacı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Bozyaka Izmir Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Applications of patients to the outpatient clinics of health institutions are not subject
to any control and are left to the patient’s choice. System is confused by patients, especially in close
specialties, and patients make appointments from the outpatient clinic, which is unrelated to their
complaints. Likewise, a group of patients does not come to arbitrary appointments. Making an erroneous
appointment or failing to attend an appointment causes a serious loss of time for physicians and other
patients. Appointments from an outpatient clinic not related to the disease. In our study, the data of
patients who made an incorrect appointment from our outpatient clinic in the last one year and did not
come to their appointment were analyzed retrospectively.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;The data of patients who made an incorrect appointment from our outpatient
clinic and did not come to their appointments within a year using central physician appointment system
were analyzed retrospectively.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;Of 1482 patients who made an appointment through the central physician appointment system,
278 (18.8%) did not come to their appointment. 128 (8.6%) patients had an incorrect appointment.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Organizing outpatient clinic appointments through the central system aims to enable
patients to reach the service more easily and to benefit from the outpatient clinic service at a time
convenient for them. It is a common situation that patients do not come to their appointments or make
an incorrect appointment, causing unnecessary loss of workforce and the inability of other patients who
request outpatient services to get an appointment.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=201</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>thoracic surgery</keyword><keyword>outpatient clinic</keyword><keyword>central physician appointment system</keyword><keyword>erroneous appointments</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>100</startPage>
              <endPage>105</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0017</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>202</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Abdominothoracic fistulas due to complicated echinococcosis: surgical treatment and outcome</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yekta Altemur Karamustafaoglu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fazlı  Yanık</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yener  Yoruk</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Abdominothoracic fistulas are severe complications of hydatid disease. We report here on
the results of treatment of hydatid abdominothoracic fistulas in 17 patients.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Material and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;A single-center case series of 17 patients with abdominothoracic fistulas (ATF)
was treated at our hospital from 2004 and 2019. Nine men and eight women patients (age range: 46-85
years; median age: 59 years) were treated for abdominothoracic fistulas (ATF). The main symptoms were
dyspnea, chest pain, cough, purulent sputum, high fever in 15 patients and additionally biliptysis in two
patients. Fistulas were hepatopleural (HPF) in 14, bronchobiliary (BBF) in two and abdominopleural
in one patient.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Fourteen patients were operated for HPF and 3 (18%) patients were treated with percutaneous
transhepatic drainage and tube thoracostomy. All patients were discharged from the hospital in good
health. Our strategy consisted of adequate evacuation of the intrahepatic cyst,closure of the fistula via
thoracophrenotomy and long term drainage of the intrahepatic or subhepatic cyst space up to ceased
biliary drainage.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; ATF due to hydatid cyst is uncommon. In rare cases ATF may be present at the
abdominal,thoracic or diaphragmatic level. Thoracophrenotomy is the best surgical treatment for all three
levels.In unstable patients only long-term percutaneous drainage should be applied. Medical treatment
with Albendazole is indicated when dissemination is confirmed. Early diagnosis and management of
septic associated complications are main goal.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=202</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>abdominopleural fistula</keyword><keyword>complication</keyword><keyword>cyst hydatid</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>106</startPage>
              <endPage>108</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0018</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>203</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Esophageal perforation, aortic pseudoaneurysm and aorto-oesophageal fistula caused by ingestion of a chicken bone</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Cihan  Ozgur</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yekta Altemur Karamustafaoglu</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Nermin  Tuncbilek</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Namik Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Esophageal foreign bodies are an emergency entity. Rarely, it can cause fatal complications such as
aorto-oesophageal fistula. In this study, the authors present a case of esophageal perforation, aortic
pseudoaneurysm, and aorto-oesophageal fistula in an adult male patient after chicken bone ingestion,
resulting in a poor outcome. An urgent and multidisciplinary approach is very critical in the diagnosis,
treatment, and clinical management of aorto-oesophageal fistula.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=203</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>aorto-oesophageal fistula</keyword><keyword>aortic pseudoaneurysm</keyword><keyword>chicken bone</keyword><keyword>esophageal perforation</keyword><keyword>foreign body</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>109</startPage>
              <endPage>112</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0019</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>204</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Six different types of primary tumors in a lady: multiple primary tumors</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Funda  İncekara</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>İlteriş  Türk</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Funda  Demirağ</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Şevki Mustafa Demiröz</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Göktürk  Fındık</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Multiple primary tumors are the ones that develop in the same patient at the same or different times.
Each separate tumor should be proved to be malignant by histologic examination to rule out metastatic
disease. A 59 year-old female patient was referred to our clinic for a newly diagnosed solitary pulmonary
nodule. She is an uncommon case who has six primary tumors; a Kaposi’s sarcoma of extremity, an
infiltrative ductal carcinoma of breast and four different types of lung neoplasms.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=204</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>adenocarcinoma in-situ</keyword><keyword>carcinoid tumor</keyword><keyword>infiltrative ductal carcinoma</keyword><keyword>Kaposi’s sarcoma</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2023-08-23</publicationDate>
              <volume>8</volume>
              <issue>2</issue>
              <startPage>113</startPage>
              <endPage>116</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2023.0020</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>205</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">A case of tracheal adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with carinal resection and adjuvant radiotheraphy</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Murat  Erdogan</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Omer  Topaloglu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Sami  Karapolat</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ali  Akdogan</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Celal  Tekinbas</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Anesthesiology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Adenoid cystic carcinoma originates from the glands in the tracheobronchial mucosa and its primary
treatment is complete surgical resection.&lt;p&gt;
A 43-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with the complaints of cough, phlegm and haemoptysis
continuing for the last 2 years. In his physical examination, a decrease in breath sounds was found in his
left hemithorax during auscultation. As chest x-ray showed a left hilar enlargement, a thoracic computed
tomography was taken which revealed a mass 17x21 mm in size extending from the lateral side of the
lower left tracheal wall into the left main bronchus, considerably constricting the lumen. A biopsy was
taken from the lesion during fiberoptic bronchoscopy and its histopathologic examination led to the
diagnosis of Adenoid cystic carcinoma.&lt;p&gt;
The patient was operated under general anaesthesia using right posterolateral thoracotomy which
involved carinal resection and anastomosis of the distal side of the trachea with the right main bronchus
end-to-end, and of the right intermediary bronchus with the left main bronchus end-to-side. Since
surgical margin positivity was found in histopathologic examination, he was prescribed adjuvant
radiotherapy. The patient is still asymptomatic after a 2-year follow-up.&lt;p&gt;
Although negative surgical margins may not be achieved in locally advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma,
resection of the tumor through complex surgical procedures with the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy
enables long term survival.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=205</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>adenoid cystic carcinoma</keyword><keyword>trachea</keyword><keyword>surgery</keyword><keyword>radiotherapy</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record></records>