<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://www.doaj.org/schemas/doajArticles.xsd">


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>1</startPage>
              <endPage>5</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.001</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>215</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Benefits of routine uniportal thoracoscopy during rib fixation in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injury</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Onur  Derdiyok</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Uğur  Temel</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, SBÜ Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;The incidence of missed diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is about 30%.
Lower rib fractures may cause TDI. We aimed to present our clinical results of uniportal video-assisted
thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in terms of detecting and repairing TDI, in patients undergoing rib fixation.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; In this retrospective study, routine uniportal VATS was performed in patients
planned to undergo rib fixation due to flail chest and severely displaced rib fractures between January 2021
and January 2023. The results of 11 patients with TDI were investigated.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;All patients were male. Eighty-two percent of the patients had blunt type of injury. Most TDIs
were detected during VATS (55%). There were 7 left and 4 right TDIs with diaphragmatic defects varying
from 2 to 5 cm in size. Two patients had minor omental herniation. Mean number of fractured ribs was 4.
Mean duration of operation was 139 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 7 days. Morbidity developed in 1
patient (9%, wound infection).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Routine VATS in patients undergoing SSRF helps detecting and repair TDIs. Its diagnostic
benefit in the diagnosis of acute TDI is greatest in patients with multiple rib fractures involving the lower
chest wall, although there are no radiographic evidences of TDI.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=215</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>diaphragm injury</keyword><keyword>uniportal thoracoscopy</keyword><keyword>rib fracture</keyword><keyword>trauma</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>6</startPage>
              <endPage>12</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.002</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>216</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Vats versus open thoracotomy in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax: where do we stand?</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Nexhati  Jakupi</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Risto  Colanceski</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ljubica  Atanasova</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Despot  Despotovski</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Clinic Mother Theresa, Skopje, Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) can be surgically treated with video-assisted
thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or conventional open thoracotomy (OT), but there are still controversies
in the literature concerning the outcome of both procedures. We aim to compare VATS and OT in the
treatment of SP, in perioperative and postoperative outcome, as well as to determine which procedure is
more cost-effective for both the patients and the health care system.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Overall, 136 patients underwent surgery for SP at our institution, out of which
104 met the inclusion criteria of our study. Patients were further divided into two groups, consisting of
56 and 48 patients who underwent VATS and OT, respectively. Data were collected prospectively for 5
years and comparison of the perioperative and postoperative outcome, as well as cost-effectiveness of
both procedures was performed.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The VATS group was superior to the OT with shorter duration of surgery (87.77 vs 132.92
min.; p &lt; 0.05), reduced length of hospital stay (7.28 vs 9.81 days; p &lt; 0.05) and chest drain duration
(4.84 vs 5.98 days; p &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate,
bleeding and postoperative complications. Average cost per patient for VATS was significantly lower
than the cost for open thoracotomy (EUR 1504.93 vs EUR 1973.09; p &lt; 0.05).&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; VATS can be implemented as the optimal approach in the treatment of SP given the current
clinical, financial and cosmetic advantages. Like other minimally-invasive procedures, VATS has an
associated learning curve which, once is surpassed, any complications are less likely to be prevalent and
optimum results can be achieved.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=216</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword><keyword>thoracotomy</keyword><keyword>surgery</keyword><keyword>video-assisted</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>13</startPage>
              <endPage>19</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.003</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>217</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Factors affecting clinical follow-up of patients who had extended resection due to non-small cell lung cancer with vertebral invasion</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Bahar Ağaoğlu Şanlı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fatma İlknur Ulugün</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fatma  Mutlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Üstün Andaç Dinçtürk</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Volkan  Karaçam</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ömer  Akçalı</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Aydın  Şanlı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Chest wall involvement or vertebral invasion can be detected in 8-15% of patients with nonsmall
cell lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment outcomes and factors affecting overall
survival (OS) in those patients who underwent en-bloc resection due to vertebral and chest wall invasion.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;The study encompassed 15 patients with locally advanced non-small cell
lung cancer who underwent anatomical lung resection and various vertebral and/or chest wall resections
because of vertebral invasion at our institution between 2007 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, and
pathological data of these patients were collected retrospectively and the effects of these factors on
surgical outcomes and survival were evaluated.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;The mean age of the 15 patients was 59.1 ± 10.2 years. Among the patients, six had adenocarcinoma
(40%), five had squamous cell carcinoma (33.3%), one had large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (6.7%),
two had a combination of large cell neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma (13.3%), and one had pleomorphic
cell carcinoma (6.7%). Simultaneous to lung resection, hemicorpectomy in four patients (26.6%), total
vertebrectomy in one patient (6.6%), partial corpectomy in three patients (20.0%), en-bloc transversectomy
in five patients (33.3%), hemilaminectomy in two patients (13.3%) were performed. Two patients underwent
only vertebra resection, while 13 patients underwent partial rib resection along with the vertebra. The median
overall survival (OS) was 26.3 months (14.7-37.8). The postoperative survival rates were 93%, and 33% for
30-day, and 3-year respectively. When comparing OS among histopathological subgroups, no statistically
significant difference was observed (p = 0.473). The median OS was 9.2 months for patients who underwent
only vertebra resection, while it was 26.3 months for those who underwent vertebra and rib resection (p =
0.534). Other clinical features such as neoadjuvant treatment status, surgical margin positivity, and presence
of recurrence did not exhibit a statistically significant impact on the patients&#039; survival.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; En-bloc resection is a treatment alternative that can be successfully applied in patients with
primary lung malignancies together with vertebral invasion. Nonetheless, chemotherapy, radiotherapy,
or immunotherapy is advised for disease management during the postoperative period.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=217</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>vertebral invasion</keyword><keyword>non-small cell lung cancer</keyword><keyword>extended resection</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>20</startPage>
              <endPage>26</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.004</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>218</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Tracheobronchial surgical interventions</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Derya Balcı Köroğlu</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Selim Şakir Erkmen Gülhan</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara Etlik City Hospital Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Surgical treatment is almost always necessary for lesions that cause stenosis or obstruction of
the tracheobronchial system. Sleeve resection is a surgical method that ensures airway continuity and reduces
the loss of lung tissue by creating a primary anastomosis following the resection of the affected segment.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;In this study, 65 patients who underwent tracheobronchial sleeve resection
and bronchoplasty at the Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital between 1974
and 1997 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient data were obtained from medical records and surgical
reports, and compared with the previous studies.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;Of the 65 patients, 34 were male and 31 were female (mean age, 32.56 years; range, 5–65 years).
Tracheal resection and reconstruction were performed in 25 patients because of stenosis and neoplasm,
whereas bronchial sleeve resection and bronchoplasty were performed in 40 patients because of benign
neoplasm, bronchial adenoma, bronchial carcinoma, endobronchial foreign body, and bronchial rupture.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/b&gt;Resection of a small bronchial segment instead of pneumonectomy offers a curative
treatment alternative for centrally localized, benign endobronchial lesions with low malignancy
potential. In bronchial carcinomas, the results obtained from the complete removal of tumor tissue
with sleeve lobectomy in a selected group of patients have shown that this surgical method may be
an alternative to pneumonectomy. In patients with bronchial cancer, pneumonectomy should not be
performed if sleeve lobectomy is possible. The high postoperative quality of life and low mortality and
morbidity emphasize the superiority of this surgical method over pneumonectomy.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=218</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>pneumonectomy</keyword><keyword>bronchial anastomosis</keyword><keyword>bronchoplasty</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>27</startPage>
              <endPage>31</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.005</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>219</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Is the double edge closure technique effective against post-thoracotomy pain in the long term?</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Salih  Bilen</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Celal Buğra Sezen</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Volkan Onur Yaran</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Meral Selin Onay Mahmuti</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yunus  Aksoy</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Cemal  Aker</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Muzaffer  Metin</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nazilli State Hospital, Aydın, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term pain and quality of life of patients following
the pericostal closure (PC) and double edge closure (EC) techniques.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This prospective study was conducted between April 2019 and January 2021
with 60 patients who underwent thoracotomy and surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;The median length of stay was 4 days for both the EC and PC groups (p = 0.608). Complications
occurred in 11 patients (18.3%) overall, including 5 patients in the PC group (16.7%) and 6 patients in the
EC group (20%). The complication rate did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.739). The
most common complication was prolonged air leak (n = 9, 15%). Mean postoperative pain scores were
lower in the EC group than in the PC group on the first 4 days and at 2 weeks (p &lt; 0.05). While there was
no difference between the two groups in terms of neuropathic pain at 6 months, an analysis of quality of
life showed that the PC group experienced more perceived pain.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; The EC technique was associated with less thoracotomy pain in the early postoperative
period. However, it was not found to affect neuropathic pain in the long term.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=219</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>thoracotomy</keyword><keyword>pain</keyword><keyword>double edge technique</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>32</startPage>
              <endPage>37</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.006</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>220</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Catastrophic injuries caused by tube thoracostomy with trocar: a series of nine cases</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Gizem Keçeci Özgür</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Dilara  Gürsoy</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ufuk  Çağırıcı</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ali  Özdil</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Tevfik Ilker Akçam</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ayşe Gül Ergönül</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Kutsal  Turhan</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Yüksekova State Hospital, Hakkari, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background: &lt;/b&gt;Tube thoracostomy is a procedure that is frequently used in thoracic surgical practice.
However, in certain circumstances, it may lead to serious complications during or soon after the
procedure. Herein, we report a series of tube thoracostomies causing life-threatening intrathoracic and
intraabdominal injuries.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;This case series consisting of nine cases with serious organ and vascular injuries
after tube thoracostomy between 2014 and 2021 are presented and the possible causes are discussed. The
indications for tube thoracostomy were empyema, COVID pneumonia-related pneumothorax, traumatic
pneumothorax, tracheal rupture related-hydropneumothorax during nasogastric tube application, and
pleural effusion due to malignancy. A trocar was used in all patients for tube thoracostomy.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;Malpositioned thoracic drains included five pulmonary parenchymal lacerations and pulmonary
artery, spleen, liver and stomach injuries; one of each.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; In the light of these cases, all the procedures and the faults that caused those embarrassing
complications have been reviewed honestly. Lessons learned from these events such as avoiding the use of
trocars, and CT evaluation before the procedure may also help to prevent such complications in the future.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=220</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>malposition</keyword><keyword>chest tubes</keyword><keyword>injuries</keyword><keyword>tube thoracostomy</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>38</startPage>
              <endPage>46</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.007</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>221</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Results of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell lung cancer</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Tarık  Yağcı</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Ahmet  Üçvet</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Serkan  Yazgan</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Özgür  Samancılar</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Soner  Gürsoy</name>
                                <affiliationId>5</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Thoracic Surgery Clinics, Ankara Güven Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Thoracic Surgery Clinics, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Thoracic Surgery Clinics, İzmir Medicana International Hospital, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="5">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bakırçay University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, survival rates achieved only by surgical treatment
are unfortunately lower than expected. It’s believed that survival rates can be raised by multimodal therapies
including surgery. The purpose of the study is to analyse the results of surgical treatment in patients who
underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment due to locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/b&gt;The patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant
chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy due to locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were included
in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to oncological treatment indication.
Group A included patients who received neoadjuvant therapy due to T disease and group B due to
N2 disease. The surgical interventions, pathological results, postoperative complications, mortality,
recurrence, 5-year disease-free survival, and overall survival were analysed.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;154 patients were included in the study. 142 were men and 12 were women with a mean age of
57.7 ± 16.97 (between 35 and 77). Ninety-six patients received induction therapy due to T disease, and 58
patients due to N2 disease. Pneumonectomy was performed on 41 patients, lobectomy was performed on
113 patients (18 bronchial sleeve resection). Histopathologic results revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 96
(62.3%), adenocarcinoma in 52 (33.8) and large cell carcinoma in 6 (3.9%) patients. A complete response to
neoadjuvant treatment was achieved in 19 (Group A, n = 15, group B, n = 4) patients. Postoperative pathologic
results showed mediastinal lymph node metastasis in 13 (13.6%) patients in group A and, in 28 (48.3%) patients
in group B, which is statistically significant. Prolonged air leak was the most common complication in both
groups. Operative mortality was observed in 4 (2.6%) patients. In 82 patients 47 in group A and 35 in group
B recurrence or metastasis were detected during the follow-up. 5-year disease-free survival rate was 43.2% in
group A and 38.4% in group B. Five- year survival rate was 46.1% in group A and 38% in group B.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; The patients who achieved a histopathologic complete response following induction therapy
had statistically significantly better disease-free and overall survival rates. Pathologically proven lymph node
metastasis increased the rate of recurrence or metastasis significantly (p = 0.01). The disease-free and overall
survival rate decreased significantly (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001). It is deducible in light of these findings that
patients who received neoadjuvant treatment for N2 achieved better disease-free survival and overall survival.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=221</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>lung cancer</keyword><keyword>induction therapy</keyword><keyword>lung resection</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>47</startPage>
              <endPage>50</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.008</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>222</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">A case of congenital total pericardial agenesis mimicking pneumothorax findings</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hakkı  Ulutaş</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Mehmet  Ağar</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Nevzat  Erdil</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Muhammet Reha Çelik</name>
                                <affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Point Hospital, Izmir, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazığ, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Inonu, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="4">Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Atılım, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Congenital pericardial agenesis has been reported as usually asymptomatic cases, operated on for other
reasons and found incidentally or in autopsy reports. Herein, we present a case of congenital total
pericardial agenesis mimicking the findings of pneumothorax and incidentally detected in a uniportal
video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Total agenesis of the pericardium, which is very rare and
usually asymptomatic, has a very good prognosis and does not require additional treatment unless it
causes complications. It may mimic pneumothorax findings.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=222</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>pericardial agenesis</keyword><keyword>uniportal VATS</keyword><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword><keyword>congenital</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>51</startPage>
              <endPage>54</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.009</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>223</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for a giant mediastinal teratoma in a pediatric patient</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Omer Faruk Demir</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Murat  Şahin</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Çiğdem  Gonca</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Hilal  Munzur</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Fatma Tanrıkulu Benli</name>
                                <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Yeter Düzenli Kar</name>
                                <affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Pathology, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="3">Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Mediastinal teratomas are tumors originating from the primitive germ streak. The primary treatment
for these tumors is surgery, traditionally performed through thoracotomy or sternotomy. Video-Assisted
Thoracic Surgery (VATS) procedures have been increasingly employed in adult patients. However,
the utilization of the VATS approach in pediatric patients remains limited worldwide. Furthermore,
the presence of teratomas in the anterior mediastinum poses a challenge for VATS surgery in pediatric
patients, as it involves delicate anatomical structures such as the heart, vena cava, and aorta. Here
we present the case of a symptomatic pediatric patient weighing 35 kilograms who presented with
respiratory distress. The patient had a mass measuring 7.5 cm in diameter with indistinct borders with
the pericardium. The patient underwent a successful complete surgery using the VATS technique. VATS
is a reliable surgical approach for mediastinal teratoma surgery in pediatric patients, provided the
surgeon has adequate experience.</abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=223</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>mediastinal teratoma</keyword><keyword>mature teratoma</keyword><keyword>pediatric surgery</keyword><keyword>teratoma</keyword><keyword>video-assisted thoracic surgery</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record>


            <record>
              <language>eng</language>
              <publisher>Turkish Society of Thoracic Surgery</publisher>
              <journalTitle>Current Thoracic Surgery</journalTitle>
              <issn></issn>
              <eissn>2548-0316</eissn>
              <publicationDate>2024-04-19</publicationDate>
              <volume>9</volume>
              <issue>1</issue>
              <startPage>55</startPage>
              <endPage>0</endPage>
              <doi>10.26663/cts.2024.013</doi>
              <publisherRecordId>224</publisherRecordId>
              <documentType>article</documentType>
              <title language="eng">Pneumothorax or pseudopneumothorax?</title>
                <authors>
                              <author>
                                <name>Tarık  Yagci</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                              <author>
                                <name>Berkant  Ozpolat</name>
                                <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
                              </author>
                      </authors>
              <affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng"></abstract>
              <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://cts.tgcd.org.tr/pdf.php?id=224</fullTextUrl>
              <keywords><keyword>invasive procedures</keyword><keyword>diagnostic imaging</keyword><keyword>pneumothorax</keyword>
                  </keywords>
            </record></records>