Abstract
Introduction
Case Presentation
Five months later, the patient developed a small, firm, fixed subcutaneous nodule on his surgical scar. A second surgery was performed consisting of excision of the tumor and partial resection of the sixth rib, including the intercostal chest wall, for definitive diagnosis and treatment. The tumor was a smooth, soft mass located primarily within the intercostal soft tissues and adherent to the sixth rib, but without lung involvement. The chest wall defect was reconstructed using polypropylene mesh, and the wound was closed by dissecting and advancing by three muscles, the latissimus dorsi, pectoralis minor, and rectus abdominis. Given the good skin elasticity, primary closure of the incision was achieved (Figure 3). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Pathological examination revealed local recurrence with aggressive features, including focal tumor necrosis and a mitotic count of 14 per 10 high-power fields. As the recurrence developed five months after the initial surgery, the patient underwent radiotherapy and remains under active surveillance. The patients gave written informed consent to collect, analyze, and publish his medical data in this study.
Discussion
EHE can occur in any part of the body and may present as a unifocal lesion, with locoregional metastases, or with systemic metastases [5]. Furthermore, intrathoracic EHE usually presents as bilateral pulmonary nodules, and to our knowledge, this case represents the second reported case of chest wall EHE. The clinical presentation at diagnosis is highly variable; patients may exhibit respiratory symptoms such as pleuritic chest pain, pleural effusion, or hemoptysis, although some cases may remain asymptomatic [6]. A review of the literature reveals that chest wall involvement is very uncommon [7]. In the present case, we initially suspected a spontaneous hematoma because of the negative result of the needle biopsy.
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the soft tissues may arise in either supra- or sub-aponeurotic compartments. These tumors frequently develop in proximity to blood vessels, reported in 50–70% of cases, and can sometimes cause vascular lumen obstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for the primary soft tissue disease, it presents as heterogeneous mass close, particularly following the administration of contrast agents, and may include calcifications, spontaneous hemorrhages, peripheral edema, or bone erosions [8].
EHE is diagnosed based on histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features [5]. Histologically, the tumor is composed of nests and cords of epithelioid endothelial cells, occasionally admixed with spindle cells. Cytological features of EHE include cells with moderate to abundant cytoplasm and pleomorphic nuclei with frequent intranuclear pseudoinclusions [5]. Approximately 10% of cases demonstrate marked nuclear atypia with prominent nucleoli, areas of necrosis, and elevated mitotic activity (>2 mitoses per 10 highpower fields); these features are associated with more aggressive clinical behavior, which was the case in our patient and may explain the recurrence despite an R0 resection at the first operation [1]. Immunohistochemically, EHE typically expresses vascular markers such as Fli-1, CD31, ERG, and CD34 [5].
The treatment of choice for confirmed unifocal epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is complete surgical excision. Resection should be performed in specialized referral centers with expertise in sarcoma surgery [7]. The tumor must be resected en bloc, including the biopsy tract, with microscopic negative (R0) margins, achieving a cure rate of approximately 70- 80%. The risk of local recurrence remains in the range of 10-15%. The tumor is considered relatively radiosensitive, although the role of radiotherapy (RT) is not well established. Adjuvant RT is recommended in selected cases, particularly when margins are close or positive and the risk of local recurrence is significant [1], which was indicated in our case. Systemic treatment is not routinely indicated for localized disease. In contrast, in metastatic settings with unequivocal progression, symptom aggravation, or organ impairment, systemic therapy may be considered, although no established standard of care currently exists [1].
In conclusion, chest wall epithelioid hemangioendothelioma represents a rare entity with unpredictable behavior. Complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment when feasible, even in the setting of local recurrence, which highlights the crucial role of long-term surveillance.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
Authors’ contribution
I.A.: Conceptalization, data curation, investigation,
software, project administration, visualization, writing -
original draft, writing - review & editing, H.H.: Conceptualization,
formal analysis, methodology, project administration,
visualization, writing - original draft, writing
- review & editing, M.L.: Funding acquisition, resources,
supervision, validation, writing - review & editing, Y.O.:
Funding acquisition, resources, supervision, validation,
writing - review & editing, M.S.: Funding acquisition,
supervision, validation, writing - review & editing.
Reference
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).