Abstract
Introduction
The incidence of this anomaly is estimated to be approximately 1 in 17,000 live births. Due to the high frequency of associated tracheobronchial tree malformations, such as complete tracheal rings (O-shaped rings) and tracheal stenosis, most patients present with lifethreatening respiratory distress, stridor, or recurrent pneumonia shortly after birth [3]. However, in a very small subset of patients where the airway is structurally robust or the compression is mild, the condition may remain clinically silent. The literature regarding adult-onset or incidentally discovered pulmonary sling is sparse, making each documented adult case vital for understanding the natural history of this congenital malformation [4].
Case Presentation
Laboratory workup showed a normal D-dimer level and negative cardiac troponins. C-reactive protein (CRP) was initially 4.1 mg/L. Despite the low probability based on the Wells criteria and normal D-dimer, the severity and persistence of the pain necessitated a pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) to definitively rule out pulmonary embolism (PE).
The CTA excluded PE but revealed an incidental pulmonary sling. The LPA was observed arising from the RPA and coursing posteriorly between the trachea and esophagus, just above the carina, toward the left lung (Figures 1-3). A concurrent 10 mm right-sided pleural effusion was identified. The patient was monitored; on the second day, his CRP rose to 10.5 mg/L, supporting the diagnosis of idiopathic pleurisy. Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was initiated. At the one-week follow-up, the CRP had decreased to 4.9 mg/L, and the patient’s symptoms had completely resolved. The pulmonary sling was documented as an incidental, asymptomatic finding.
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 1: Axial CT angiography image demonstrating the left pulmonary artery (LPA) originating from the right pulmonary artery (RPA) and its course posterior to the trachea (asterisk: RPD, arrow: LPA). |
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 2: Posterior view of the three-dimensional volume-rendered CT reconstruction. The image demonstrates the heart, left atrium (black arrowhead), and pulmonary veins (white arrowheads). The right main pulmonary artery is visualized (black arrow), along with the anomalous left pulmonary artery (asterisk), which originates from the right pulmonary artery and follows a retro-cardiac course. The esophagus is observed as a columnar structure positioned anterior to the anomalous left pulmonary artery (white arrows). |
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 3: Axial Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) image showing the anomalous left pulmonary artery (white asterisk) arising from the right pulmonary artery (black asterisk) and passing between the trachea (white arrow) and the esophagus (black arrow), confirming the diagnosis of pulmonary artery sling syndrome. |
Following the initial identification of the anomaly on CT, a cardiovascular surgery consultation was performed to assess the potential for surgical intervention. A comprehensive evaluation, including axial MIP and 3D reconstructions, revealed no evidence of critical hemodynamic compromise or hemodynamically significant tracheobronchial stenosis. Consequently, in the absence of symptoms, a conservative strategy involving regular clinical and radiological monitoring was adopted by the multidisciplinary team. Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.
Discussion
Pulmonary slings are classified into two main types based on the Landing and Wells system [6]:
Type 1 (Classic): The LPA arises from the RPA, and the bifurcation of the trachea (carina) is at the normal level (T4-T5). The sling compresses the right main bronchus and the lower trachea.
Type 2 (Complex): This is more common and involves an abnormally low carina (T6 level) and "Tshaped" bronchi. This type is frequently associated with "bridging bronchus" and long-segment tracheal stenosis due to complete O-shaped rings.
Our case likely represents a Type 1 variant, given the absence of chronic respiratory symptoms and the normal carinal position observed on imaging.
While the classic presentation involves 'the ringsling complex' in neonates, adult cases are often discovered incidentally during routine lung screenings or during the evaluation of unrelated clinical symptoms [7,8]. The lack of symptoms in adults is generally attributed to the absence of intrinsic tracheal abnormalities. In our patient, the discovery was purely incidental during an evaluation for chest pain. This highlights that while the "sling" is anatomically present, it may not always be physiologically obstructive.
In symptomatic infants, the gold standard of treatment is surgical reimplantaton. This involves detaching the LPA from the RPA and anastomosing it to the main pulmonary trunk, anterior to the trachea [9]. If tracheal stenosis is present, simultaneous slide tracheoplasty is performed. In contrast, for asymptomatic adults, the management is controversial. Most experts recommend a conservative "wait and watch" approach, as the risks of major thoracic surgery usually outweigh the benefits in the absence of airway compromise [10]. However, its presence should be noted, as it can complicate endotracheal intubation, transbronchial biopsy, or future mediastinal surgeries [11].
Although PAS is classically associated with severe respiratory distress in infancy, this case demonstrates that the anomaly can remain clinically silent until the fourth decade of life. We hypothesize that the lack of intrinsic tracheal abnormalities and a relatively preserved airway diameter provided a compensatory mechanism that prevented early clinical manifestation.
In conclusion, pulmonary sling syndrome in adults is a rare but important diagnostic entity. This case demonstrates that the anomaly can remain silent for over three decades. CT angiography remains the definitive tool for diagnosis; however, its incidental finding should prompt a comprehensive evaluation of the airway using both advanced radiological imaging and, when clinically indicated, bronchoscopy to exclude underlying tracheobronchial malformations
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
Authors’ contribution
All authors contributed to the conception, data collection,
writing, and final approval of the manuscript.
Reference
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).


