Summary
Introduction
Case Presentation
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 1: Axial (a) and sagittal (b) scans of chest computed tomography show a 17 mm, well-circumscribed soft tissue mass in the presternal region (arrow) and a malpositioned sternal wire (asterisk). |
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 2: Three-dimensional volume-rendered CT reconstruction showing a malpositioned sternal wire (asterisk) and soft tissue mass (arrow). |
![]() Click Here to Zoom |
Figure 3: Intraoperative photograph demonstrating the malpositioned sternal wire (asterisk) and the associated presternal mass (arrow). |
Discussion
Radiological evaluation of elastofibroma typically involves ultrasonography, CT, and MRI. Classic imaging findings include a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass with attenuation similar to skeletal muscle and interspersed fatty streaks, producing a layered or striated appearance [4,5]. However, in atypical locations, these characteristic features may be absent. In our case, imaging findings were non-specific, and malignancy could not be excluded, necessitating surgical excision. In the differential diagnosis of the lesion, a vascularized soft-tissue malignancy was considered the most likely possibility. The painful nature of the lesion, its fixation to the surrounding tissues, and the marked vascularity observed on Doppler ultrasonography initially raised suspicion for a soft-tissue malignancy. Computed tomography findings further supported the presence of a soft-tissue mass. Granulation tissue associated with a malpositioned sternal wire was also included in the differential diagnosis. Other considerations included benign soft-tissue neoplasms, such as desmoid tumors and fibromas. As a definitive radiological diagnosis could not be established, histopathological examination was performed for definitive diagnosis.
Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis, with characteristic findings including dense collagen bundles, fragmented elastic fibers, and interspersed adipose tissue. Special stains such as Verhoeff-Van Gieson are essential for confirming the diagnosis and excluding malignancy [6]. Although conservative management may be appropriate for asymptomatic lesions in typical locations, surgical excision is recommended in symptomatic cases or when malignancy cannot be ruled out. Recurrence after complete excision is exceedingly rare, consistent with the favorable outcome observed in our patient.
In conclusion, although elastofibroma is most commonly encountered in the periscapular region, fixed presternal lesions are usually regarded as potentially malignant. Therefore, complete surgical excision is often preferred to establish a definitive diagnosis and provide treatment. In our case, histopathological evaluation of a lesion that had been excised under the presumptive diagnosis of malignancy revealed an elastofibroma. Elastofibroma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of anterior chest wall masses in patients with a history of sternotomy, particularly when sternal closure wires are present. Awareness of this rare presentation may help avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate management.


